Week 3: So… how about this paper, then? – Ethan

Up until this point, the structure of my actual paper has been nothing more than a periodically passing, vaguely worrisome thought — but that won’t turn out a paper, will it?

And so, this past weekend I hammered out a rough diagram (T. Olga suggested that I think about it like that instead of an outline) for it, and I honestly have no idea if it will stay anything like how I have it now in my final draft.

However, as of now it has 3 sections that I think it’s safe to say will make it through the whole process:

  1. The pertinent scope of history for my research (i.e. 1945-1967) and the foreign policy actions taken by the various American presidential administrations towards crucial actors in the Six-Days’ War.
  2. The frame through which the Six-Days’ War was covered by the NYT.
  3. The theoretical framework that — I will argue — explains why the NYT’s particular frame of the Six-Days’ War would have been carried down from lead foreign policymakers in the contemporary American government.

If nothing else, it’s a much more specific rendering of my thesis, as laid out in my first post: to “come up with a theoretical basis — a model, if you will — describing why a platform in far-reaching large-scale media outlets would be useful to the American government in justifying foreign policy in the first place.”

What I have now is more nuanced and sounds less like a conspiracy theory, and I think that’s a good thing moving forward.

Well, apart from reading and synthesizing ever more material (always an exciting endeavor), that wraps it up for this week’s update. Next week could very well have me reworking the paper from the ground up, but at this point in mid-February, I’m happy with where I am.

 

— EDM

 

One thought on “Week 3: So… how about this paper, then? – Ethan

  1. sabrina.schoenborn

    Really glad to see that you got a rough outline/rough diagram of your paper! This is, for me, the hardest part of your paper: narrowing it down and finding out what goes where. I am so excited to see your paper and continue to hear about your process. If you need an outside opinion/an editor/some advice – just find me. Great work!

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.